Albert Pujols is Not Jimmy Foxx

Albert Pujols is off to a terrible start. At the end of play on May 23, he was batting .268 with eight home runs. His on base average is .340, and he is slugging only .421.

Many in the media are wondering what has happened to Pujols. Responses range from a lingering hamstring injury incurred in late April that affects his swing to the fact that Pujols is 31 years old and is supposedly on the decline.

There is validity to the lingering hamstring injury, but it is healing. Last night, Pujols hit his first home run since Apr. 23 to win the game for the first place St. Louis Cardinals.

The idea that Pujols is on the decline at the age of 31 is ridiculous. One “expert” who writes for MSNBC’s Hard Ball Talk (HBT) compares Pujols to Jimmy Foxx, which is ludicrous.

Foxx played his first full season at the age of 21, as did Pujols. His first 11 seasons were eerily similar to Pujols’ first 10 seasons.

Foxx hit .337/.442/.649 to Pujols’ .331/.426/.624, but then Foxx tailed off precipitously. After hitting 36 home runs at the age of 32, he hit only 19 home runs the following season. He never again reached double figures in home runs, and never hit more than higher than .268.

On the surface, using Foxx based on the offensive similarities between him and Pujols seems valid. Defensively, Pujols has played third base as well as first base. So did Foxx.

But Jimmy Foxx, sadly, was a chronic alcoholic which was related to a beaning he suffered that knocked him unconscious. He was in the hospital for four days but suffered sinus problems from the beaning for the rest of his life.

The sinus problems were extremely painful, which probably changed Foxx from a mild drinker into an alcoholic, since alcohol helped ease his physical pain.

It is much better to compare Albert Pujols to Lou Gehrig.

The following compares Pujols’ first 10 seasons to those of Gehrig:

Pujols 1900 426 15 408 1230 .331 .426 .624
Gehrig 1996 400 130 357 1487 .346 .452 .645

In his 11th season, at the age of 33 in 1936, Gehrig batted .354 with 49 home runs, a .478 on base average, and a .696 slugging average.

Pujols will not come close to those number this year, but it must be pointed out that American League batters in 1936 hit .289, had a .363 on base average, and slugged .421.

At this point in 2011, National League batters are hitting a mere .250 with a .319 on base average and a .384 slugging average.

Pujols’ batting average will increase. He has a great chance to once again bat over .300.

Although eight home runs is well below his norm, even if he continued at that pace, which he will not, he would finish with close to 30 home runs.

Great players (even most non-great players) do not start to lose their skills at the age of 31. Pujols has been the best player in the game ever since Alex Rodriguez’ 2007 season ended.

Interestingly, A-Rod’s skills have gone down since that 54 home run season when he was 31 years old, but like Foxx, the third baseman for New York’s other team, the New York Yankees, had problems.

A-Rod admitted steroid use, which may have led to his hip problems, which affected his swing and production.

Albert Pujols’ season is just getting started. This year appears to be another “year of the pitcher,” which is affecting almost all players’ offensive production.

Pujols may finish with lower batting numbers than in the past, but there can be and should little doubt that he will finish among the top hitters in the league by the time the season is over.

Albert Pujols was injured after getting off to a slow start. The injury is healing, the slump is ending slowly, and Pujols’ production should soon return to normal

If it doesn’t, it doesn’t mean that at the age of 31 he is declining. It means that he had a bad year.


Hard Ball Talk

Jimmy Foxx at Sabr

Albert Pujols at Bleacher Report